![]() ![]() Nonetheless, I think the proposed workflow totally relevant. It's easier with links to images in a sub-directory. With full resolution images embedded, you will soon have a 100Mb document. like Writer if you check the box during insertion. I don't know about InDesign, but Scribus uses relative links to images. I've always thought that desktop publishing with intense graphic used other software like InDesign or Scribus. I've some problem while reading "graphic professional", "full resolution image" and Writer or Word. And with the Jérôme's confirmation box you won't miss the setting once it is introduced, right? , or rather it makes no sense because mixing the automatic operation. ![]() By default, this is set for print (220 ppi), but you can change this." Īctually the Minimizer workflow is exactly what you get when the auto compression option is switched off. "Pictures in Office are automatically compressed using the number specified in the Image Size and Quality options on the Advanced tab of the program options. We had a look how MS handles compression and do suggest a similar workflow here. > Or with our Impress Presentation Minimizer. > I suggest you try this feature on MS Office. ![]() Or rather it's weird to mix the automatic processing with user input. Unfortunately dev said it's not possible. And if it would be possible to undo the compression it's pretty easy for the user to change the inserted image. Possible, but does it change the workflow? I mean it just exposes tools > options whatever to a checkbox.ĭespite that an indicator could be nice. When clicking on this indicator a popup window would ask > A small indicator over the image could show if it has been automatically Next the user choice is saved into the user environnement. > An other solution is be asking to the user the first time he is inserting an If a user need a part of an image to fit the full page, then he/she would use a specific image processing tool or he/she would disable this feature into the settings dialog. ![]() Maybe this feature could have an option in order to tell if the margins of the page should be taken into account (in addition to the user defined max dpi). This would increases the gap between the resolution of the inserted image and the user defined max dpi. Moreover, if you take into account a 1 cm margin, the area to be fit is 2362x3390 pixels at 300 dpi. The difference between those form factors and the maximum number of pixel allowed by the page (user defined maximum resolution) would help to guess the new resolution of the inserted image. Note that the A4 form factor doesn't fit a 4/3 form factor of the image. This would keep enough margin in order to later crop or resize the image before exporting with the "minimizer" tool.įor example, if you have a 10 Megapixel image (4/3 form factor, 3640 pixels for the big side), it will exceed 300 dpi if you make this image fill a A4 page (21x29,7 cm or 8,3x11,7 inches or 2480x3507 pixels at 300 dpi). Picture tmpPic = picture.resize(picture.currentSize).crop().withJPEGCompressionRatio(0.7) Īt insertion time (or at saving time as you proposed), you can reasonably assume that the image would possibly not exceed the page dimension. If (picture.currentSize < picture.initialSize) Since you already have all the code required to resize the pictures and save them, and since the whole point of a WYSIWYG editor is to perform action in live, I'm asking if it's possible to add a menu action (not automatic, but manual), where Writer would do: Third, what I'm asking here is for simplifying the process to the end-user.Įven for a power user who knows about pictures / resolution, having to fire up Gimp / Photoshop, figure out the part to crop, resize, save to a temporary folder, drag the worked picture to the document, and then realizing it's still too large / small, is very long, painful, if not disappointing. Usually, people try to send a document as an email attachement, and a 30MB file is a no-no. Second, your main competitor has this options for ages (appeared in Word 95), so you can't tell user to switch to your software if this feature is missing. And I'm not asking about creating a picture editor in LO. Well I'm sorry, but I think you're not leading in the right direction.įirst, most people using Writer usually don't have the skills to open Gimp / Photoshop and resize the picture, nor the knowledge about how pictures work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |